4.6 Article

Synthesis, Structure, and Properties of New Mg(II)-Metal-Organic Framework and Its Prowess as Catalyst in the Production of 4H-Pyrans

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 56, 期 11, 页码 2917-2924

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04795

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation, Pretoria, South Africa
  2. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new alkaline metal-organic framework, [Mg-3(NDC)(3)(DMF)(4)]center dot H2O (1) is synthesized solvothermally by using 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid (NDC) as ligand and dimethylformamide (DMF) and water as mixed solvent. Single crystal X-ray studies show that 1 crystallizes in the space group C2/c with parameters a = 13.4191(2), b = 18.0669(2), c = 20.9746(3) angstrom, and ss = 99.66(0)degrees. The central metal atom Mg(II) adopts a six coordinated octahedral geometry with carboxylate oxygen atoms and DMF molecules. Due to the involvement of oxygen atoms in bridging and chelation binding, a trinuclear secondary building unit is built up, which further connects to other six NDC ligands and finally leading to a three-dimensional network. The thermal and luminescent analysis revealed that the compound is thermally stable with violet emission. The creation of coordinatively unsaturated Mg(11) centers, acting as Lewis-acidic sites upon activation, are explored to use 1 as heterogeneous catalyst in-value-added organic conversions. MOP showed a superb catalytic performance in the synthesis of eight 4H-pyran derivatives via one-pot three,component:reaction between aromatic aldehydes, malononitrile, and cyanoacetamide at tooth temperature. All the reactions worked exceptionally well with excellent yields (91-96%), in short reaction times (<40 min). Green solvent (ethanol) and easy separation, reusability and robust structure of catalyst are the attractions of the protocol and make [Mg-3(NDC)(3)(DMF)(4)]center dot H2O an ideal catalyst for wide-ranging organic transformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据