4.7 Article

Influences of grain size and temperature on tribological characteristics of CuAlNi alloys under nanoindentation and nanoscratch

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105865

关键词

Polycrystalline; Grainsize; Reverse Hall-Petch; Special wear rate; Nanoscratch

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST106-2221-E-992-333-MY3, MOST106-2221-E-992-343-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanical response of CuAlNi nanocrystalline under the nanoscratch through an abrasive tip sliding on the workpiece is investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The influences of the grain size, alloy composition, temperature and scratch speed on the plastic deformation characteristic and wear mechanism are surveyed. The results represent that increasing the grain size leads to higher force and hardness, which suggests the reverse Hall-Perch relationship. Meanwhile, the indentation and scratch forces tend to increase when reducing the Cu content and temperature, increasing the scratch speed. The deformation behavior exhibits that grain boundaries play a key role in inhibiting the spread of strain and stress. The results show that the stress and strain are concentrated not only in the contact region between the abrasive tip and substrate but also in the grain boundary and adjacent grain boundary areas. Notably, the sliding, twisting of grain boundary and the fusion of grains are a significant mechanism in the deformation behavior of polycrystalline, resulting in the dislocation is strongly developed in the grain boundary. Furthermore, the movement of atoms in various directions leads to different morphology of pile-up. From quantitative results of the special wear rate show that the ability to lose material volume is larger with Cu86Al11Ni3 alloy and at a temperature of 600 K, as well as the polycrystalline is higher than the single-crystalline. Finally, the residual depth ratios exhibit more strain recovery at the grain size of 6.17 nm and lower temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据