4.1 Article

Daily high-dose aspirin does not lower APRI in the Aspirin-Myocardial Infarction Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 139-142

出版社

NANJING MEDICAL UNIV
DOI: 10.7555/JBR.33.20190041

关键词

liver fibrosis; aspirin; APRI; antiplatelet; AMIS

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG TI 988/1-1]
  2. NIH [K08DK115883]
  3. ACG
  4. AASLD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antiplatelet agents reduce liver fibrosis by inhibiting platelet activation and platelet-derived growth factor production. Previous cross-sectional epidemiological studies suggest that the use of aspirin is related to reduced liver fibrosis. The Aspirin-Myocardial Infarction Study (AMIS) aims to examine this relationship in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial. The existing clinical trial of aspirin was conducted to study the benefit of one gram aspirin daily among 4 524 individuals who had experienced at least one documented myocardial infarction. The aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) was calculated at baseline and annually from the platelet count and AST levels. Participants in the AMIS trial had a mean baseline APRI of 0.34 +/- 0.36, and only 1% individuals had APRI scores higher than 1.0, a common cutoff for cirrhosis. The daily use of aspirin was associated with an increase, rather than a reduction of APRI, by 0.007 per year (95% CI 0.002-0.015, P=0.12). The use of aspirin did not significantly affect platelet counts. In a sensitivity analysis of individuals with probable significant fibrosis at baseline (APRI >= 0.7), the aspirin group had a sustained reduction in APRI over time, although this change was not significant compared to that in the placebo group. In the AMIS trial, the daily use of high-dose aspirin did not significantly affect APRI, a surrogate index of liver fibrosis. This study highlights the need for de novo clinical trials to investigate the potential benefit of antiplatelet agents on liver fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据