4.6 Article

Non-Ionizing Label-Free Photoacoustic Imaging of Bones

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 160915-160920

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020559

关键词

Bones; Optical imaging; Biomedical imaging; Optical scattering; X-ray imaging; Blood vessels; Biomedical imaging; bone imaging; diagnostic radiography; label-free; non-ionizing radiation; photoacoustic imaging; X-ray radiography

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea Government [Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT)] [NRF-2019R1A2C2006269]
  2. Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), through the Korea Health Technology Research and Development Project - Ministry of Health and Welfare, South Korea [HI15C1817]
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, through the Basic Science Research Program - Ministry of Education [2020R1A6A1A03047902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray based radiography, the main modality for diagnostic imaging of bone structures and fractures, provides sensitive images, but it inherently involves potentially harmful X-ray exposure. As non-ionizing alternatives, various optical imaging methods have been explored. Here, we demonstrate non-ionizing, label-free, multispectral photoacoustic (PA) imaging of bones in small animals in vivo. in situ. and ex vivo. Using near-infrared light excitation and acoustic detection, the spine and ribs were successfully visualized in high-resolution PA images. PA 3D volume images of the spine and ribs were clearly visualized together with blood vessels and several organs including the spleen, liver, and cecum, without using any exogenous contrast agent nor ionizing radiation. Quantification results of multispectral PA signals from blood vessels and bones were in good agreement with their absorption coefficients. Further, a rib fracture was photoacoustically imaged. Our results demonstrate PA imaging's potential as a non-ionizing and label-free technique for imaging bone tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据