4.8 Review

Fundamentals and challenges of ultrathin 2D photocatalysts in boosting CO2 photoreduction

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 49, 期 18, 页码 6592-6604

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00332h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2019YFA0210004, 2017YFA0207301]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21975242, 21890754, 21805267]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB36000000]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [CX2340007003]
  6. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS [QYZDY-SSW-SLH011]
  7. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation [161012]
  8. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019TQ0304, 2020M671871]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide photoreduction currently suffers from low photoconversion efficiency and poor product selectivity. Ultrathin two-dimensional materials, which possess highly active sites with high density and high uniformity, can serve as ideal models to tailor three crucial parameters that determine the carbon dioxide photoconversion efficiency and product selectivity. In this review, we summarize the extended absorption spectrum range enabled by ultrathin two-dimensional semiconductors with defect levels and intermediate bands, as well as conductors with special partially occupied bands. Moreover, we overview the boosted carrier separation efficiency aroused by ultrathin two-dimensional semiconductors with defect states, surface polarization states and built-in electric fields. We also review the accelerated redox reaction kinetics induced by ultrathin two-dimensional semiconductors with in-plane heterostructures, isolated single atoms and abundant low-coordinated dual-metal sites. Finally, we end this review with an outlook on unsolved issues concerning highly selective and efficient photo-conversion of carbon dioxide into C(2+)products by ultrathin two-dimensional materials with dual or multiple active sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据