4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of nanostructured calcium oxides supported onto biochar and their application as catalysts for biodiesel production

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 52-66

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.045

关键词

Biodiesel; Nanostructured catalysts; Heterogeneous catalysis; Waste cooking oil; FAME

资金

  1. IProPBio Integrated Process and Product Design for Sustainable Biorefineries (MSCA e RISE 2017: Research and Innovation Staff Exchange) [778168]
  2. Junta de Extremadura [IB16167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured calcium oxides supported onto biochar obtained by pyrolysis of avocado seeds were prepared, characterized and successfully used as catalysts to produce biodiesel from waste oils. The effect of increasing calcium load (5, 10 and 20 wt%) was investigated. Elemental analysis, FTIR, XRD, SEM, BET, acid and basic sites were used to characterize the resulting carbon-based calcium oxides. Supported systems efficiently promoted the transesterification of oil with methanol, but differently from calcium oxide, they were easily recoverable and reusable for three cycles without any loss of activity. Kinetic data were better fitted by a pseudo-second order model with an activation energy of 39.9 kJ mol(-1). Thermodynamic parameters of activation energy were also determined for the transesterification reaction (Delta(double dagger) G: 98.68-106.08 kJ mol(-1), Delta(double dagger) H: 37.05 kJ mol(-1) and Delta S-double dagger: 0.185 kJ mol(-1) K). Finally, reaction conditions were optimized using the desirability function applied on the response surface methodology analysis of a Box-Behnken factorial design of experiments. By carrying out the reaction at 99.5 degrees C for 5 h with 7.3 wt% of catalyst and a molar ratio of methanol to oil of 15.6, a FAME content over 96% was achieved. Even starting from waste cooking oil, final biodiesel was conform to the main EN14214 specifications. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据