4.7 Article

On the effect of biogas composition on the H2 production by sorption enhanced steam reforming (SESR)

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 575-583

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.122

关键词

Biogas; CH4/CO2 composition; Hydrogen; Sorption enhanced steam reforming; Pd/Ni-Co catalyst; CO2 capture; Dolomite

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN [ENE2017-83530-R]
  2. Gobierno del Principado de Asturias (PCTI) [IDI/2018/000115]
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  4. Ramon y Cajal grant of the Spanish government [RYC-2017-21937]
  5. European Social Fund (ESF)
  6. Spanish MICINN (FPI program) [PRE2018-083634]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biogas is a valuable source of renewable energy produced from biodegradable organic materials via anaerobic digestion. The production of H-2 by sorption enhanced steam reforming (SESR) of biogas has been studied thermodynamic and experimentally. A Pd/Ni-Co catalyst and dolomite as CO2 sorbent were used. The effect of biogas composition (CH4/CO2 vol.%) on the process was evaluated at 600 and 650 degrees C in a fluidized bed reactor using biogas CO2 concentrations of 5-50 vol.%. During conventional biogas steam reforming (SR), high CH4 partial pressures in the feed favor the process, producing high H-2 concentrations. During biogas SESR, CO2 was effectively removed from the gas phase by the sorbent for all the biogas compositions, and it did not alter the process compared to pure methane. Steam methane reforming (SMR) and water-gas shift (WGS), together with carbonation, were the main reactions occurring during biogas SESR. Dry (or CO2) methane reforming did not occur under the conditions studied due to the relatively low temperature and the presence of steam. High H-2 purity (98.4 vol.%) and H-2 yield (91%) were experimentally obtained, pointing out the biogas SESR as a promising technology for the efficient production of high-purity, high-yield hydrogen from a renewable source. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据