4.8 Article

Mitochondrial Proteostatic Collapse Leads to Hypoxic Injury

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 16, 页码 2171-2176

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.062

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS [R01-NS045905, R21-NS084360-02]
  2. NIGMS [T32-GM07200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxic injury is a key pathological event in a variety of diseases. Despite the clinical importance of hypoxia, modulation of hypoxic injury mechanisms for therapeutic benefit has not been achieved, suggesting that critical features of hypoxic injury have not been identified or fully understood. Because mitochondria are the main respiratory organelles of the cell, they have been the focus of much research into hypoxic injury. Previous research has focused on mitochondria as effectors of hypoxic injury, primarily in the context of apoptosis activation [1] and calcium regulation [2]; however, little is known about how mitochondria themselves are injured by hypoxia. Maintenance of protein folding is essential for normal mitochondrial function [3], whereas failure to maintain protein homeostasis (proteostasis) appears to be a component of aging [4, 5] and a variety of diseases [6, 7]. Previously, it has been demonstrated that mitochondria possess their own unfolded protein response [8-10] that is activated in response to mitochondrial protein folding stress, a response that is best understood in C. elegans. Because hypoxia has been shown to disrupt ATP production and translation of nuclear encoded proteins [11] both of which are shown to disrupt mitochondrial proteostasis in other contexts [3, 12] we hypothesized that failure to maintain mitochondrial proteostasis may play a role in hypoxic injury. Utilizing C. elegans models of global [13, 14], focal [15], and cell non-autonomous hypoxic injury, we have found evidence of mitochondrial protein misfolding post-hypoxia and have found that manipulation of the mitochondrial protein folding environment is an effective hypoxia protective strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据