4.7 Article

Antibiotic resistance gene transfer during anaerobic digestion with added copper: Important roles of mobile genetic elements

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 743, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140759

关键词

Bacterial community; Co-occurrence; Copper resistance gene; Mobile genetic element; Network analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671474, 41601531]
  2. Science and Technology Plan Key Project of Shaanxi province [2017ZDCXL-SF-03-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The abuse of heavy metals as feed additives in livestock is widespread and it might aggravate the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) Lt the environment. However, the mechanisms that allow heavy metals to increase the transmission of ARGs in the environment remain unclear. Cu is the heavy metal present at the highest concentration in livestock manure, and thus Cu was selected to investigate the responses of ARGs to heavy metals. The effects of the microbial communities, mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and heavy metal resistance genes (HMRGs) on ARGs were determined in the presence of 75 and 227 mg L-1 Cu in a swine manure anaerobic digestion (AD) system. In the AD products, the presence of residual Cu (75 and 227 mg L-1) increased the total ARGs, HMRGs, and some MGEs, and the higher Cu selected more ARGs than the lower Cu treatment. The results demonstrated that Cu could promote the co-selection of HMRGs, ARGs, and MGEs. The different levels of Cu did not change the bacterial community composition, but they influenced the abundances of bacteria during AD. Network analysis showed that the presence of Cu increased the co-occurrence of specific bacteria containing ARGs, HMRGs, and MGEs. Furthermore, the co-occurrence of MGEs and ARG5 increased greatly compared with that of HMRGs and ARGs. Therefore, compared HMRGs, the increased MGEs had the main effect on increasing of ARGs. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据