4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Morphogenetic, Ontogenetic and Diurnal Variability in Antimicrobial Activity of Bitter Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Miller var. vulgare) Essential Oil

期刊

出版社

ASSOC PHARMACEUTICAL TEACHERS INDIA
DOI: 10.5530/ijper.51.3s.10

关键词

Antibacterial; Antifungal; Growth inhibition; Minimal inhibition concentration; Volatile oil

资金

  1. Scientific Research Projects Unit (BAP) of Ordu University [AR-1317 BAP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There has been considerable interest in antimicrobial activity of plant essential oils in recent years. Objectives: This research was carried out to determine morphogenetic, ontogenetic and diurnal variability in antimicrobial activity of bitter fennel essential oil. Methods: To specify morphogenetic variability, leaf and root-bulb-stalk samples taken at pre-, full and post-flowering, flower samples picked at full flowering and seed samples gathered at two seed growth stages were used. For ontogenetic and diurnal variability, whole plant samples were taken at pre-, full and post-flowering and at 9: 00 am, 1: 00 pm and 5: 00 pm. A total of 10 microorganisms have been used to determine antimicrobial activity of essential oils with disc-diffusion and microdilution broth methods. Results: The highest inhibitory effect among leaf essential oils was observed from post-flowering samples, but essential oils of root-bulb-stalk samples of pre-flowering produced the highest antimicrobial activity. Whole plant essential oils of post-flowering samples produced higher antimicrobial activity than those of pre- and full flowering samples. Generally, inhibitory effect of seed essential oils extracted at the beginning of seed formation was higher than those of seed maturity. Daily harvesting time caused no effect on antimicrobial activity of essential oils of whole plant samples. Conclusion: The present study reveals that antimicrobial activity of bitter fennel essential oil significantly vary based on plant parts and growth stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据