4.5 Article

Diamond forms during low pressure serpentinisation of oceanic lithosphere

期刊

GEOCHEMICAL PERSPECTIVES LETTERS
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 19-24

出版社

EUROPEAN ASSOC GEOCHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.7185/geochemlet.2029

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) Funds
  2. Spanish Projects [CGL2015-65824, RTI2018-099157-A-I00, PID2019-105625RB-C21, A.RNM.186.UGR18]
  3. Ramon y Cajal Fellowship [RYC-2015-17596]
  4. FPU
  5. Mexican research program CONACYT-Ciencia Basica [A1-S-14574]
  6. Mexican research program UNAM-PAPIIT [IA-101419]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diamond is commonly regarded as an indicator of ultra-high pressure conditions in Earth System Science. This canonical view is challenged by recent data and interpretations that suggest metastable growth of diamond in low pressure environments. One such environment is serpentinisation of oceanic lithosphere, which produces highly reduced CH4-bearing fluids after olivine alteration by reaction with infiltrating fluids. Here we report the first ever observed in situ diamond within olivine-hosted, CH4-rich fluid inclusions from low pressure oceanic gabbro and chromitite samples from the Moa-Baracoa ophiolitic massif, eastern Cuba. Diamond is encapsulated in voids below the polished mineral surface forming a typical serpentinisation array, with methane, serpentine and magnetite, providing definitive evidence for its metastable growth upon low temperature and low pressure alteration of oceanic lithosphere and super-reduction of infiltrated fluids. Thermodynamic modelling of the observed solid and fluid assemblage at a reference P-T point appropriate for serpentinisation (350 degrees C and 100 MPa) is consistent with extreme reduction of the fluid to logfO(2) (MPa) = -45.3 (Delta logfO(2)[Iron-Magnetite] = -6.5). These findings imply that the formation of metastable diamond at low pressure in serpentinised olivine is a widespread process in modern and ancient oceanic lithosphere, questioning a generalised ultra-high pressure origin for ophiolitic diamond.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据