4.8 Article

High energy-density supercapacitor based on a novel conjugated poly (1, 5-diaminoanthraquinone)/intercalated graphene composite system

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 475, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228692

关键词

Supercapacitor; Poly (1, 5-Diaminoanthraquinone); Modified graphene oxide; Superior electrochemical stability; Electrochemical kinetic behavior; High energy density

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20963009, 21163017, 21563027, 21773187, 21905123]
  2. Tianyou Youth Talent Lift Program of Lanzhou Jiaotong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we select a novel multi-redox poly (1, 5-diaminoanthraquinone) (PDAAQ) as electroactive material and Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) modified graphene oxide (CGO) as conductive substrate. Benefit from the excellent dispersion of CGO in organic polymerization medium and the abundant functional groups on the surface of CGO, 1, 5-diaminoanthraquinone (DAAQ) monomers may covalently graft on the conducting substrates and realize the directional growth of PDAAQ via the in-situ chemical oxidative polymerization. In three-electrode system, the optimization of PDAAQ/CGO electrode exhibits a high specific capacitance of 760 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1) and superior electrochemical stability of 90.4% after 10 000 cycles. Most importantly, the electrochemical kinetic behavior of PDAAQ/CGO electrode is studied in detail. The result indicates that the energy storage process of PDAAQ/CGO is a synergistic result of diffusion-controlled process and capacitive effects, and the latter one is dominant. According to the simulation calculation of kinetic model, the capacitive contribution ratio of PDAAQ/CGO can be as high as 80.6% at a scan rate of 50 mV s(-1). Finally, the as-fabricated asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) can deliver an energy density up to 41.1 W h kg(-1) at a power density of 1000 W kg(-1), indicating a great potential application in high performance supercapacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据