4.7 Article

Mechanical properties and mechanism of wollastonite fibers reinforced oil well cement

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120461

关键词

Wollastonite fibers; Oil well cement; Mechanical properties; Microstructure; Toughening mechanism

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0303600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874254]
  3. key laboratory of the development and utilization of advanced materials for natural gas [X151519KCL20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wollastonite fibers (WFs) were used to reinforce the oil well cement (OWC). The compressive strength, flexural strength, tensile strength and stress-strain curves of WFs reinforced oil well cement pastes (OWCPs) were studied. The strengthening mechanism was studied by analyzing WF-reinforced OWCPs with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), nitrogen adsorption method (BJH), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The results show that compared with those for pure OWCP, the compressive strength, flexural strength and tensile strength of the OWCP with a WF content of 15% cured at 90 degrees C for 7 days increased by 34.64%, 98.79% and 46.46% respectively. In addition, the toughness of the OWCP with a WF content of 15% improved. The microstructure analysis showed that a good interface adhesion appeared between the WFs and OWCP due to the presence of chemical bonds. The addition of WFs reduced the content of cement hydration products, namely lamellar CH, by reacting with CH to form hydrated calcium silicate (C-S-H), which improved the mechanical properties of the OWCPs. Adding WFs improved the pore structure distribution of the OWCPs. The improvement in the toughness of the OWCP with a WF content of 15% was attributed to the crack bridging and fiber pull- out toughening mechanisms. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据