4.7 Article

A multi-responsive chemosensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of Fe3+, Cu2+, Cr2O72- and nitrobenzene based on a luminescent lanthanide metal-organic framework

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 49, 期 37, 页码 13003-13016

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0dt02120b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province of China [13A150056, 201910475035, 162300410010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excessive release of some hazardous chemicals, such as Fe3+, Cu2+, Cr2O72-- and nitrobenzene, may endanger public health and the environment; therefore, targeted effective sensing strategies are important. In this report, a series of lanthanide-based metal-organic frameworks (Ln-MOFs), namely {[Ln(dpc)(2H(2)O)]center dot(Hbibp)(0.5))(n) (H(4)dpc = 2-(3',4'-dicarboxylphenoxy) isophthalic acid, bibp = 4,4'-bis(imidazolyl) biphenyl, for I-VI, Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, and Eu) were hydrothermally synthesized and characterized. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction indicates that I-VI are isostructural and the lanthanide center is nine-coordinated with a distorted tetrakaidecahedral configuration. The as-synthesized Ln-MOFs are assembled into three-dimensional frameworks through the connections of dpc(4-) ligands and hydrogen bonding interactions. Notably, Eu-MOF M) behaves as a multi-responsive luminescent sensor toward Fe3+, Cu2+, Cr2O72-- and nitrobenzene with high sensitivity, selectivity, stability and anti-interference ability against the coexistence of other ions or molecules based on high luminescence quenching efficiency. Additionally, Eu-MOF (VI) shows excellent luminescence stability and retains its structural integrity within the pH range of 212 in an aqueous solution and its solid sample maintains high thermodynamic stability up to 320 T. Furthermore, the possible luminescence sensing mechanisms have been discussed in detail, and are supported by PXRD analysis, UV-vis spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or density functional theory (DFT).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据