3.8 Article

The emergence of azithromycin-resistant Salmonella Typhi in Nepal

期刊

JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa109

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Typhoid fever remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Asia and Africa. The emergence of azithromycin resistance in South Asia is concerning, as azithromycin is one of the last effective oral drugs for treating typhoid. Objectives: To describe the molecular mechanism and phylogenetics of azithromycin-resistant (Azith(R)) Salmonella Typhi isolates from Patan Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Methods: Whole-genome sequences of three Azith(R) S. Typhi isolates (MIC>256 mg/L) were analysed and compared with a global collection to investigate the azithromycin resistance mechanism and phylogenetic structure. Clinical information is reported for one of the three patients infected with Azith(R) S. Typhi. Results: The three Azith(R) isolates belonged to the H58 lineage and were genetically identical; they were distantly related to contemporaneous S. Typhi from Nepal and Azith(R) S. Typhi recently described in Bangladesh. Azithromycin resistance was mediated by a non-synonymous mutation in the acrB gene (R717L). The three Azith(R) isolates showed reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (double mutation in the gyrA: S83F and D87G), and were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol and co-trimoxazole. Clinical information from one patient suggested non-response to azithromycin treatment. Conclusions: This is the first molecular description of Azith(R) S. Typhi in Nepal. These organisms showed no phylogenetic link to Azith(R) S. Typhi in Bangladesh. Our data suggest that increasing use of azithromycin may pose a strong selective pressure driving theemergence of Azith(R) S. Typhi in South Asia. Further investigations are needed to evaluate treatment responses to azithromycin, predict evolutionary trajectories, and track the transmission of these organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据