4.7 Article

Decolorization and detoxification of azo dye by halo-alkaliphilic bacterial consortium: Systematic investigations of performance, pathway and metagenome

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111073

关键词

Azo dye; Mixed bacterial consortium; Halo-alkaliphilic; Degradation pathway; Metagenome

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31600091]
  2. Innovative Foundation of Nanjing Institute of Technology [CKJA201907]
  3. Basic Research Foundation of Beijing University of Technology [PXM2019-014204-500032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high pH and salinity of textile wastewater is a major hindrance to azo dye decolorization. In this study, a mixed bacterial consortium ZW1 was enriched under saline (10% salinity) and alkaline (pH 10.0) conditions to decolorize Methanil Yellow G (MY-G). Consortium ZW1 was mainly composed of Halomonas (49.8%), Marinobacter (30.7%) and Clostridiisalibacter (19.2%). The effects of physicochemical factors were systematically investigated, along with the degradation pathway and metagenome analysis. The co-carbon source was found to be necessary, and the addition of yeast extract led to 93.3% decolorization of 100 mg/L MY-G within 16 h (compared with 1.12% for control). The optimum pH, salinity, temperature and initial dye concentration were 8.0, 5-10%, 40 degrees C and 100 mg/L, respectively. The typical dye-related degradation enzymes were most effective at 10% salinity. Consortium ZW1 was also able to differentially decolorize five other direct and acidic dyes in a short period. Phototoxicity tests revealed the detoxification of MY-G degradation products. Combining UV-vis, FTIR and GC-MS detection, the MY-G degradation pathway by consortium ZW1 was proposed. Furthermore, metagenomic approach was used to elucidate the functional potential of genes in MY-G biodegradation. These results signify the broad potential application of halo-alkaliphilic consortia in the bioremediation of dyeing wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据