4.7 Article

Interactions and immobilization of lanthanides with dopants in uranium-based metallic fuels

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
卷 540, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152372

关键词

Metallic fuel; FCCI; Fuel additive; First-principle calculations

资金

  1. U.S. Dept. of Energy's Nuclear Energy University Programs (NEUP) [DE-NE0008557]
  2. Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Dept. of Energy [DE-AC07-05ID14517]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In uranium-based fuels, production and migration of lanthanide fission products and subsequent chemical interactions with cladding constituents lead to fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI), limiting fuel performance. In general, dopant addition to the fuel matrix to arrest lanthanides within the fuel by forming intermetallics is found to be effective in mitigating FCCI. Recently, we proposed ab initio based alloy-design principles, which can be useful in identifying dopant(s) that can bind a lanthanide (Nd) inside the fuel matrix. Here, we demonstrate the robustness of such principles by performing a systematic study to choose dopants to form compounds with a range of experimentally-observed lanthanide fission products. Results reveal that for a given dopant, lanthanide Ce and La exhibit similar behavior in their compound-forming tendencies compared to Nd and Pr, which is linked to lanthanide intrinsic characteristics such as the electronic configurations. Our predicted lanthanide-dopant intermetallic formation is verified experimentally in selective cases. Finally, we showed alloy design principles that accurately identify previously known dopants like Pd, and also predict new dopants As and Se, that can be effective in binding all lanthanides within the uranium matrix. Overall, this research helps to develop generic alloy-design principles for complex multi-component systems based on lanthanide and dopant intrinsic characteristics. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据