4.7 Article

Fast Discrete Collaborative Multi-Modal Hashing for Large-Scale Multimedia Retrieval

期刊

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2019.2913388

关键词

Semantics; Optimization; Collaboration; Correlation; Training; Binary codes; Complexity theory; Multi-modal hashing; pair-wise semantics; computation and memory efficiency; fast discrete optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61802236]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong, China [ZR2019QF002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many achievements have been made on learning to hash for uni-modal and cross-modal retrieval. However, it is still an unsolved problem that how to directly and efficiently learn discriminative discrete hash codes for the multimedia retrieval, where both query and database samples are represented with heterogeneous multi-modal features. With this motivation, we propose a Fast Discrete Collaborative Multi-modal Hashing (FDCMH) method in this paper. We first propose an efficient collaborative multi-modal mapping that first transforms heterogeneous multi-modal features into the unified factors to exploit the complementarity of multi-modal features and preserve the semantic correlations in multiple modalities with linear computation and space complexity. Such shared factors also bridge the heterogeneous modality gap and remove the inter-modality redundancy. Further, we develop an asymmetric hashing learning module to simultaneously correlate the learned hash codes with low-level data distribution and high-level semantics. In particular, this design could avoid the challenging symmetric semantic matrix factorization and O(n(2)) memory cost (n is the number of training samples). It can support both computation and memory efficient discrete hash optimization. Experiments on several public multimedia retrieval datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach compared with state-of-the-art hashing techniques, in terms of both model learning efficiency and retrieval accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据