4.6 Article

Molecular mechanism of anion size regulating the nanostructure and charging process at ionic liquid-electrode interfaces

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 38, 页码 19908-19916

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta06643e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21922813, 21808220, 21890762, 21878295, 21776278]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems [MPCS-2019-A-08]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2017066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the ionic liquid (IL)-electrode interface is imperative for the applications of supercapacitors or other electrochemical systems. Here, the electrical double layer transition and charging process of the ILs-based supercapacitor were explored by performing molecular dynamics simulations with the constant electrical potential method. The structure transition is first illuminated by the analysis of number density, ionic orientation, electrode charge distribution and ion displacement, showing the formation process of the electrical double layer. Meanwhile, the co-existing cation and anion in the interfacial region cause the electrode to possess a non-Gaussian charge distribution and the ionic displacement demonstrates that both the interfacial layer and the bulk liquid contribute to the total energy storage, which is a common feature of the ILs system, contrary to the conventional viewpoint. Furthermore, the interfacial layer thickness, charging time and average differential capacitance (at high voltage) all increase with the anion size (in the order of BF4--> PF6--> OTf--> TFSI(-)with the same cation of Bmim(+)), indicating that the larger anion can restrain the ionic movements and enhance the capacitance. The identified correlation between the charging mechanism and anion characteristic would be helpful for the molecular design of the ILs-electrode interface in the supercapacitors or other key chemical engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据