4.5 Article

Gender differences of B cell signature related to estrogen-induced IFI44L/BAFF in systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 71-78

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2016.12.002

关键词

Systemic lupus erythematosus; B cells; Gender difference; IFI44L

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81402940, 81401223, 81501403]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Province [BK20150700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) possesses a gender-dependent incidence characterized by a male/female ratio 1:9. B-cell, a vital part of the immune system, plays an important role in pathogenesis of SLE. Thus, we hypothesize that gender differences of B cells may exist in SLE and relate to the onset and the progression of SLE. Here, we showed that the genes expression pattern is similar between healthy female and male. However, SLE female and SLE male showed more upregulated genes, in which the trendline of SLE male is higher than that of SLE female. The most differentially expressed genes between SLE male patients and female patients are only on two chromosomes. While the differentially expressed genes between healthy male and female are distributed on several chromosomes. There are more differentially expressed genes in SLE male vs healthy male than these in SLE female vs healthy female. OAS3, RGS13, STAGS, IFI44L, STS-1, FERILI4, ZBTB16, USP18, USP41, RSAD2, FKBP5, IL1R2, DNAPTP6 and ILI27, which top 14 significantly upregulated mRNAs in SLE patients compared with healthy donors, showed different expression pattern in gender-based analyses. Furthermore, we revealed that this difference may be related to estrogen-induced IFI44L/BAFF. Therefore, we conclude that the diagnosis and treatment of these immune-related diseases should consider the baseline gender-related differences. (C) 2016 European Federation of Immunological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据