4.0 Article

Exploring Polypyrrole as Extraction Phase for Disposable Pipette Extraction Method for Multiclass Organic Micro-Pollutant Determination in River and Tap Water Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 31, 期 10, 页码 2164-2173

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
DOI: 10.21577/0103-5053.20200119

关键词

disposable pipette extraction; DPX; phthalate esters; organophosphorus pesticides; organochlorine pesticides; endocrine disruptor compounds

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of a polypyrrole (PPy) is described as an efficient extraction phase for disposable pipette extraction (DPX), in a fast and ruggedized analytical method for simultaneous determination of 18 organic micro-pollutants in water using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The DPX-blank pipettes were filled with PPy. a material produced through the chemical polymerization of PPy using iron(III) chloride hexahydrate. The optimized conditions were 5 extraction cycles with 600 mu L of sample, adjusted to pH 9. and desorption with 150 mu L of ethyl acetate using 7 cycles with the same aliquot. The calibration curves resulted in determination coefficient (R-2) higher than 0.9963, the limit of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.4 to 1.5 mu g L-1, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were from 1.4 to 5.0 mu g L-1. Excellent results were obtained for repeatability (2.3 to 15%, for 5 mu g L-1) and intermediate precision, varying the day of analyses (3.9 to 15.5%) and the pipette tip (3.4 to 22.4%). The anal yte recovery ranged from 75.4 to 115.0% for river water, and from 74.9 to 116.2% for tap water, in three different levels of concentration. The DPX-GC-MS method with PPy was successfully applied to determine the 18 analytes in river and tap water from the cities of Joinville and Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据