4.7 Article

Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Conditional Variational Autoencoders-Particle Filter

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2020.2996004

关键词

Batteries; Predictive models; Degradation; Estimation; Reliability; Data models; Mathematical model; Conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE); lithium-ion batteries (LIBs); particle filter (PF); remaining useful life (RUL); resampling method

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61873024, 61773053]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the China Central Universities of USTB [FRF-TP-19-049A1Z]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0306403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate prediction of remaining useful life (RUL) is of great significance to the safety and reliability of lithium-ion batteries, which is able to provide useful reference information for maintenance. Particle filter (PF)-based prognostic methods have been widely used in the RUL prediction of batteries. However, due to the degeneracy of particles, the prediction accuracy of the traditional PF is not high. In this article, a novel PF framework based on conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) and a reweighting strategy is proposed to predict the RUL of batteries. First, the CVAE algorithm is described in detail and embedded into the PF framework to substitute the traditional prior distribution so as to alleviate particle degradation. Furthermore, a reweighting strategy is introduced during particle resampling to prevent the loss of particle diversity. Afterward, the state-space model of battery capacity is established on the basis of data analysis. In the end, the proposed CVAE-PF is employed to predict the degradation of the battery capacity, and the RUL can be obtained when the capacity drops to a predefined failure threshold. From the experimental results it can be concluded that the new method is able to achieve better prediction performance compared with some traditional methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据