4.6 Article

Interpreting correlated random parameters in choice experiments

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102363

关键词

Choice experiment; Correlated parameters; Random parameter logit; Scale heterogeneity

资金

  1. FEDER/Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [ECO 2017-82111-R]
  2. Basque Government [IT-642-13, IT783-13]
  3. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) [2008.0101]
  4. Diputacion Foral de Alava [2010-2970]
  5. University of the Basque Country [2010-2970]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The random parameter logit (RPL) model with uncorrelated coefficients is a restrictive version of the mixed logit model, but it is one of the most frequently used models for analysing stated choice data in environmental valuation. The body of applied literature using a more flexible version, the RPL model with correlated coefficients, has been noticeably growing in the last years, but it has still been used less frequently due to its computational complexity and non-trivial interpretation. The correlation matrix of the coefficients in this model captures not only the correlation due to a behavioural phenomenon but also the correlation caused by scale heterogeneity. These two effects cannot be identified empirically. Nevertheless, this paper proposes a simple procedure that enables an interpretation of some of the estimated correlations, which can help to disentangle the unobserved preference heterogeneity. The proposed procedure consists of two simple steps. Firstly, the signs of the attributes corresponding to the utility coefficients that have a negative mean coefficient are reversed. Secondly, only negative correlations are interpreted. We propose a theoretical model accounting for correlations induced both by hypothetical behavioural phenomena and by scale heterogeneity and apply the proposed procedure to three typical cases of environmental valuation. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据