4.7 Article

Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis (CND) Applied to Grapevines Grown in Subtropical Climate Region

期刊

HORTICULTURAE
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae6030056

关键词

Vitis viniferaL; mineral nutrition; leaf diagnostic; nutritional balance; yield

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)-Projeto Universal [407757/2016-3, 307586/2017-0]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS)
  4. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil analysis is used to estimate nutrient availability, but nutrient concentrations are not always related to yield in most fruit plants, including grapevines. Thus, additional multivariate mathematical models, such as the compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND), which takes into account leaves nutrient concentration, and yield, can contribute to estimating critical levels or sufficiency bands of elements, as well as to detect deficiency and/or excess of nutrients. The aim of the present study was to establish CND standards, and the critical level and sufficiency band of nutrients, in the grapevineVitis viniferaL., grown in a subtropical climate region. Leaves were collected in 81 vineyards in the Campanha Gaucha do Rio Grande do Sul region, Southern Brazil, and analyzed for macro- and micro-nutrient concentration. The yield of each vineyard was assessed. Grapevine nutritional status was calculated through the CND method. CND-r(2)indices were effective in establishing the nutritional status of grapevines for macro- and micro-nutrients as sub-optimal, excessive, or balanced. The CND methodology established the critical level and sufficiency bands of nutrients more accurately than the current recommendations for grapevines. Multi-nutrient associations were more effective than the single nutrient determination in defining the threshold of a given nutrient that can reduce grapevine yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据