4.7 Article

Bioinspired cellular cementitious structures for prefabricated construction: Hybrid design & performance evaluations

期刊

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103324

关键词

Triply periodic minimal surface; Cellular structure; Finite element method; Bioinspired; Lightweight structure; Additive manufacturing; Prefabricated construction

资金

  1. Vingroup Innovation Foundation (VINIF) [VINIF.2019.DA04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lightweight cellular structures with porous architectures and controllable mechanical characteristics are pro-mising candidates for a broad range of prefabricated engineering applications. A triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structure that is a naturally inspired continuous non-self-intersecting surface is a bioinspired cellular structure. In this work, we investigate a novel approach based on a combination of primitive-TPMS cells and cubic blocks along with lattice and gyroid-TPMS cells achieving 50% volume fraction cellular structures. Lightweight cellular specimens made of cement mortar with 3D printed sacrificial thermoplastic Polylactic Acid (PLA) moulds are subjected to uniaxial compressive loadings. Compression tests are carried out on the cement cubes, while tensile behaviours follow the simplified damage plasticity model, which is used to obtain the material properties for the input model data. Finite element (FE) analysis is employed to predict mechanical performances such as stress distributions, stress-strain curves, and the damage mechanisms of three representative cellular structures (primitive, lattice, and gyroid). Compressive experiment tests are conducted on these blocks and validated by the FE model. Results indicate that the mechanical responses of the cellular structure, wherein primitive cellular structures yield the highest compressive strength, could be predicted accurately through the FE analysis, and outcomes from both numerical models and experimental tests are validated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据