4.6 Article

Adding Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) and Light Scattering (LS) Devices to Obtain High-Quality Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS) Data

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst10110975

关键词

small angle X-ray scattering; size exclusion chromatography; laser light scattering; data quality; benchmarked datasets; SASBDB

资金

  1. iNEXT-Discovery - Horizon 2020 program of the European Commission [871037]
  2. German Ministry of Science and Education [16QK10A-SAS-BSOFT]
  3. Biomedical Physics of Infection grant of the Joachim Herz Stiftung (Hamburg, Germany) [900000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the updated size-exclusion chromatography small angle X-ray scattering (SEC-SAXS) set-up used at the P12 bioSAXS beam line of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) at the PETRAIII synchrotron, DESY Hamburg (Germany). The addition of size exclusion chromatography (SEC) directly on-line to the SAXS capillary has become a well-established approach to reduce the effects of the sample heterogeneity on the SAXS measurements. The additional use of multi-angle laser light scattering (MALLS), UV absorption spectroscopy, refractive index (RI), and quasi-elastic light scattering (QELS) in parallel to the SAXS measurements enables independent molecular weight validation and hydrodynamic radius estimates. This allows one to address sample monodispersity as well as conformational heterogeneity. The benefits of the current SEC-SAXS set-up are demonstrated on a set of selected standard proteins. The processed SEC-SAXS data and models are provided in the Small Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank (SASBDB) and are labeled as bench-marked datasets that include the unsubtracted data frames spanning the respective SEC elution profiles and corresponding MALLS-UV-RI-QELS data. These entries provide method developers with datasets suitable for testing purposes, in addition to an educational resource for SAS data analysis and modeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据