4.3 Article

Comparative scintillation performance of EJ-309, EJ-276, and a novel organic glass

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/11/P11020

关键词

Neutron detectors (cold, thermal, fast neutrons); Scintillators, scintillation and light emission processes (solid, gas and liquid scintillators); Radiation monitoring

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Nuclear Science and Security Consortium [DE-NA0003180]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An organic glass scintillator developed by Sandia National Laboratories was characterized in terms of its light output and pulse shape discrimination (PSD) properties and compared to commercial liquid (EJ-309) and plastic (EJ-276) organic scintillators. The electron light output was determined through relative comparison of the Cs-137 Compton edge location. The proton light yield was measured using a double time-of-flight technique at the 88-Inch Cyclotron at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Using a tunable broad-spectrum neutron source and an array of pulse-shape-discriminating observation scintillators, a continuous measurement of the proton light yield was performed for EJ-309 (200 keV-3.2 MeV), EJ-276 (170 keV-4.9 MeV), and the organic glass (50 keV-20 MeV). Finally, the PSD properties of the organic glass, EJ-309, and EJ-276 were evaluated using an AmBe source and compared via a figure-of-merit metric. The organic glass exhibited a higher electron light output than both EJ-309 and EJ-276. Its proton light yield and PSD performance were comparable to EJ-309 and superior to that of EJ-276. With these performance characteristics, the organic glass scintillator is well poised to replace current state-of-the-art PSD-capable scintillators in a range of fast neutron detection applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据