4.6 Article

In Vivo Assessment of Pulmonary Fibrosis and Pulmonary Edema in Rodents Using Ultrasound Multiple Scattering

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3023611

关键词

Lung; Ultrasonic imaging; Rats; Scattering; Surgery; Rodents; Acoustics; Multiple scattering; pulmonary fibrosis; quantitative lung ultrasound; random media

资金

  1. Department of Defense, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs [W81XWH1810101]
  2. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W81XWH1810101] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) affects 200 000 patients in the United States of America. IPF is responsible for changesin themicro-architectureof the lung parenchyma, such as thickening of the alveolarwalls, which reduces compliance and elasticity. In this study, we verify the hypothesis that changes in the microarchitecture of the lung parenchyma can be characterized by exploiting multiple scattering of ultrasound waves by the alveolar structure. Ultrasound propagation in a highly scattering regime follows a diffusion process, which can be characterized using the diffusion constant. We hypothesize that in a fibrotic lung, the thickening of the alveolar wall reduces the amount of air (compared with a healthy lung), thereby minimizing the scattering events. Pulmonary fibrosis is created in Sprague-Dawley rats by instilling bleomycin into the airway. The rats are studied within 3 weeks after bleomycin administration. Using a 128-element linear array transducer operating at 7.8MHz, in vivo experimental data are obtained from Sprague-Dawley rats and the transportmean free path (L*) and backscatter frequency shift ( BFS) are evaluated. Significant differences ( p < 0.05) in the L* values between control and fibrotic rats and in the BFS values between fibrotic and edematous rats showcase the potential of these parameters for diagnosis and monitoring of IPF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据