4.7 Article

Identification and characterization of a recombinant cognate hemoglobin reductase from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.214

关键词

Synechocystis hemoglobin; Hemoglobin reductase; Dihydrolipoami dedehydrogenase; Flavohemoglobin; Ferric leghemoglobin reductase

资金

  1. University of Delhi (RD grant)
  2. Department of Science and Technology (PURSE), Government of India
  3. University Grants Commission (SAP grant)
  4. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India
  5. CSIR, Government of India
  6. UGC
  7. University of Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One popular and relevant proposed function for cyanobacterial hemoglobin (Synechocystis Hb) is anaerobic nitrite reductase in vivo. During such reduction reactions, the hexacoordinated heme iron atom of SynHb is oxidized from the ferrous (Fe+2) to ferric (Fe+3) state and prevent damage by limiting the concentration of toxic metabolites such as nitrite. In order to perform these functions in vivo, there must be a mechanism that converts inactive Fe+3-SynHb back to the active Fe+2-SynHb to accomplish the nitrite reductase function. Here, we report a cognate reductase protein for Synechocystis hemoglobin which can reduce the Fe+3-SynHb to Fe+2-SynHb, thus lending a support to the proposed nitrite reductase function. This reductase is also able to reduce pentacoordinate Hbs such as myoglobin but with lower affinity compared to hexacoordinate SynHb. In silico model of reductase protein-cyanobacterial hemoglobin complex revealed that the heme active site of Hb faces the catalytic center of the reductase protein and several amino acids in the interface interacts non-covalently thus favoring their interaction. Overall, our in vitro study provides the basic foundation for the understanding of the specific molecular mechanism of action and interaction of the SynHb reductase protein, which need to be investigated in further detail. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据