4.5 Article

Socioeconomic Gradientsn Mortality Following HF Hospitalization in a Country With Universal Health Care Coverage

期刊

JACC-HEART FAILURE
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 917-927

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.05.015

关键词

education; epidemiology; heart failure; income; mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES This study explored the association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and long-term mortality following first heart failure (HF) hospitalization. BACKGROUND It is not dear to what extent education and income-individually or combined-influence mortality among patients with HF. METHODS This study included 49,895 patients, age 35+ years, with a first HF hospitalization in Norway during 2000 to 2014 and followed them until death or December 31, 2014. The association between education, income, and mortality was explored using Cox regression models, stratified by sex and age group (35 to 69 years and 70+ years). RESULTS Compared with patients with primary education, those with tertiary education had lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 0.99 in younger men; HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.75 in younger women; HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.97 in older men, and HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.93 in older women). After adjusting for educational differences, younger and older men and younger women in the highest income quintile had lower mortality compared with those in the lowest income quintile (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.72; HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.96, and HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.97, respectively). The association between income and mortality was almost linear. No association between income and mortality was observed in older women. CONCLUSIONS Despite the well-organized universal health care system in Norway, education and income were independently associated with mortality in patients with HF in a clear sex- and age group-specific pattern. (C) 2020 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据