4.7 Article

Desiccation in oil protects bacteria in thermal processing

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109519

关键词

Peanut oil; Desiccation; Water activity; Thermal resistance; E. faecium; Oil protection

资金

  1. USDA Agricultural and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) CAP grant [2015-68003-23415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Edible oils have long been considered to have a protective effect on bacteria from thermal inactivation, but the mechanism for this effect remains unclear. Our recent study suggests that the water activity (a(w)) of oil decreases exponentially with increasing temperature. Therefore, in thermal processing, the a(w) of the bacteria inside oil may also decrease making the bacteria more resistant to heat. To validate this hypothesis, the equilibrium a(w) of bacteria (Enterococcus faecium NRRL B2354, or E. faecium) in peanut oil samples, with different initial a(w) (0.93, 0.75, 0.52 & 0.33) at room temperature, were measured at elevated temperatures up to 80 degrees C. Meanwhile, the thermal resistances of E. faecium in these samples were also tested at 80 degrees C. Results indicate that the a(w) of the bacteria-in-oil systems changed in the same manner as that of pure peanut oil; it decreased exponentially with temperature from 0.93, 0.75, 0.52 & 0.33 (at similar to 23 degrees C) to 0.36, 0.30, 0.21 & 0.13 (at 80 degrees C), respectively. This confirmed that bacterial cells experienced desiccation in oil during the thermal treatments. The thermal death rates of E. faecium in peanut oil samples followed first-order kinetics. The D-80 value (time needed to achieve 1-log reduction at 80 degrees C) increased exponentially with the reduced a(w) at 80 degrees C, from 87 min at a(w) 0.36 to 1539 min at a(w) 0.13. A graphical comparison (logD(80) vs. high-temperature a(w)) showed a similarity between the thermal resistance of E. faecium in oil and that in dry air, which supports the hypothesis that oil protects bacteria from thermal treatments through desiccation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据