4.7 Article

Highly efficient removal of victoria blue R and bioelectricity generation from textile wastewater using a novel combined dual microbial fuel cell system

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 258, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127326

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Textile wastewater; Toxicity; Victoria blue R

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 107-2637-B-266-001-MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel combined dual microbial fuel cell (MFC) system was developed for the continuous removal of Victoria Blue R (VBR) and electricity generation. Anaerobic and aerobic VBR-degrading bacteria, Shewanella putrefaciens and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, respectively, were applied simultaneously. The effects of various factors on the performance of the novel system in the continuous mode were investigated, and optimal operating parameters for the system were determined. The optimal liquid retention time for continuous treatment was 36 h. The optimal external resistances of connected MFCs were 390 Omega and 1300 Omega. When artificial wastewater containing 1000 mg/I of VBR was fed continuously into the system, the VBR removal efficiency achieved was 98.7%. In addition, the acute toxicity of the effluent was decreased by a factor of 21.1-22.3, indicating that the system could detoxify VBR intermediates. VBR degradation involved a stepwise demethylation process, which occurred mainly in the first MFC, whereas aromatic ring opening, sequential deamination reaction, and carbon oxidation occurred mainly in the second MFC. When actual VBR-containing wastewater (75-262 mg/l) was introduced, the removal efficiencies of VBR, chemical oxygen demand, colority, NH3, and bioelectricity generation were >99.8%, >96.6%, >88.0%, 100%, and >194.8 mW/m(2), respectively and the original inoculated strains remained dominant. Therefore, the combined dual MFC system could be applied to the treatment of actual VBR-containing wastewater. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据