4.7 Article

Application of two anaerobic membrane bioreactors with different pore size membranes for municipal wastewater treatment

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 745, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140903

关键词

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor; Municipal wastewater treatment; Anaerobic digestion; Microfiltration; Biogas

资金

  1. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [19H01160]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201608050052]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H01160] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pore size is one of the most important properties in the successful operation of membrane-based bioprocesses for the treatment of municipal wastewater. The characteristics of two anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs), one with a hollow fiber membrane of 0.4 mu m pore size (AnMBR1), and the other with a membrane of 0.05 mu m pore size (AnMBR2) were investigated for the treatment of real municipal wastewater at room temperature (25 degrees C) under varied hydraulic retention times (HRTs). Process performance was evaluated in terms of organic removal efficiency, biogas production and membrane filtration behaviours during a long-term continuous operation. Both AnMBRs showed good organic removal performance with COD and BOD removal efficiencies of around 89% and 93%, respectively. High energy recovery potential was achieved, with the biogas yield ranging between 0.20 and 0.26 L-gas/g-CODrem and a methane content of approximately 75%. The differences in the membrane filtration behaviours in the two AnMBRs included different permeate flux and total filtration resistance (R-t). In the AnMBR with a 0.4 mu m pore size membrane, an average R-t of 1.08 x 10 boolean AND 12 m(-1) was obtained even when the permeate flux was a high 0.274 m/day, while a higher average R-t of 1.51 x 10 boolean AND 12 m(-1) was observed in the AnMBR with 0.05 mu m pore size membrane even when the flux was a low 0.148 m/day. The off-line membrane cleaning strategy used for AnMBR1 indicated that the membrane restoration efficiency was 90.2%. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据