4.5 Article

Strain and electric-field induced tunable electronic properties of blue phosphorus-GeS/SnS/SnSe (orthorhombic) vdW heterostructures

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS A
卷 384, 期 33, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126829

关键词

Heterostructure; Blue phosphorus; First-principles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11947105, 11904041, 11747146]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [cstc2019jcyjm-sxmX0237, cstc2018jcyjA2923]
  3. Science and Technology Research Project of Chongqing Education Committee [KJQN201800501, KJ1703042, KJ1600319]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Luminescence and Applications [SKLA-2020-10]
  5. Basic Research and Frontier Exploration Project of Chongqing Municipality [cstc2018jcyjAX0820]
  6. Dr. Scientific Research Fund of Chongqing Normal University [17XLB012, 20XlB002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we composite blue phosphorous (blueP) and monolayer GeS/SnS/SnSe through van der Waals (vdW) force interaction. It is found that blueP-GeS/SnS heterostructures are stable and form type-II band alignments, which can effectively promote the separation of photoinduced carriers. We perform a systematic theoretical study of interlayer coupling effects and band realignment of blueP-GeS/SnS/SnSe heterostructures after the strain and electric-field are imposed. BlueP and GeS/SnS/SnSe are twisted with different angles, and the theoretical framework of bands alignment and carriers' separation are established. The results show that the electronic properties of independent blueP and GeS/SnS/SnSe can be roughly maintained. When strain is applied, the band alignment shows significant adjustability by changing the external strain. Besides, the blueP-SnSe heterostructure show type-II characteristic in the range from -0.25 V/angstrom to -0.1 V/angstrom. Our theoretical calculation proves that strain and electric field engineering are two useful methods to design novel electronic devices. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据