4.5 Article

Characteristics and response to crizotinib in lung cancer patients with MET amplification detected by next-generation sequencing

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 17-22

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.021

关键词

MET amplification; Next-generation sequencing; Crizotinib; Lung cancer; Primary; Acquired

资金

  1. Scientific research program of Shanghai municipal science and technology commission [19411970900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) amplification is a rare gene alteration in lung cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of MET amplification in lung cancer and the response to crizotinib by subsets of patients with MET amplification detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients and methods: We collected NGS sequencing data for patients with MET amplification in our institution from January 2018 to April 2019. The efficacy of crizotinib in MET amplification was retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 2694 patients received NGS tests, 3.27 % (82/2507) of patients had primary MET amplification, and acquired MET amplification accounted for 16.04 % (30/187) of re-biopsy patients. Only 19 patients received monotherapy with crizotinib. In survival analysis, ten patients with copy number greater than 4 (CN > 4) had longer median PFS (mPFS) (4.76 months; 95 %CI: 1.67-7.85 months) compared with other nine patients (CN <= 4) (2.10 months; 95 %CI: 1.53-2.68 months; P = 0.063), but failed to get a statistical significance. No significant differences were observed between median PFS (mPFS) of the patients with primary and acquired MET amplification (4.04 months vs 2.76 months; P = 0.310). Conclusions: Primary and acquired MET amplification were detected in 3.27 % and 16.04 % of lung cancer patients, respectively. Patients with CN > 4 seemed to have longer PFS after crizotinib treatment. No significant differences in PFS were observed between patients with primary and acquired MET amplification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据