4.8 Article

Profit assessment of home energy management system for buildings with A-G energy labels

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 277, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115618

关键词

Home energy management system; Profit assessment; Building energy label; Floor and radiator heating system

资金

  1. Dansk Energi [350-005]
  2. Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University [350-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are various studies related to the advantages of implementing home energy management system (HEMS) for residential buildings to minimize the cost of energy consumption and improve user's comfort level. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive study to evaluate benefits of utilizing HEMS technologies in various residential buildings with different insulation quality (highly or poorly insulated buildings, which can be determined by energy labels). Therefore, in this paper, a concise yet comprehensive comparative analysis is conducted to investigate the operating profits of using HEMS technologies in residential buildings with different energy labels. Moreover, this comparative analysis is performed with two different heat emission systems: radiator only system and a combination of floor radiator system. The HEMS performance results are presented and compared for both the heating systems in terms of minimizing the cost of energy and the user's comfort. Also, the results for each building are compared with a baseline case (without HEMS technology) for both heating systems to prove the HEMS performance effectiveness. The simulation results demonstrate that the HEMS operating profits increase as the building insulation quality rises. For example, the HEMS can minimize the cost of energy by 41% in a building with label A (highly insulated building), while in a building with label G, the energy cost minimization is 26% under the same conditions. Finally, it is proved that the HEMS is more effective with floorradiator combination heat emission system rather than the radiator only system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据