4.7 Article

Multicolor nitrogen dots for rapid detection of thiram and chlorpyrifos in fruit and vegetable samples

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1136, 期 -, 页码 72-81

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.08.038

关键词

Multicolor nitrogen dots; Miniaturized array gas membrane separation; Thiram; Chlorpyrifos; Fluorescence rapid detection; Fruit and vegetable

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1606101]
  2. Research and Development Plan for Key Areas of Food Safety in Guangdong Province of China [2019B020211001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675178, 21976213]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of sensitive fluorescence sensors and efficient preparation of samples is a challenge in the detection of pesticides in complex samples. In this study, multicolor nitrogen dots (M-Ndots) were synthesised via microwave irradiation at 140 degrees C for 10 min with 5-amino-1H-tetrazole and p-phenylenediamine as precursors, which have a high fluorescence quantum yield of up to 31%. Furthermore, the M-Ndots were employed as fluorescence sensors for pesticide detection by being combined with a gas membrane separation device, to eliminate the interference from the complex sample matrix. In this process, the M-Ndots were used for sensing thiram and chlorpyrifos through their affinities to Cu2+ and Fe3+, respectively. Because thiram could decompose into volatile CS2, its derivate was sensed using the fluorescence of M-Ndots via a complexation reaction with Cu2+. Chlorpyrifos, due to its volatility, can reduce the Fe3+ ion by inhibiting the activity of acetylcholinesterase, which produces H2O2 to oxidise Fe2+. In a real application, the time consumption for 96 samples was less than 30 min in one run of the gas membrane separation device. The recoveries for thiram and chlorpyrifos ranged from 90.0% to 115.0%, and the analytical results were validated using LC-MS/MS methods, with relative errors ranging from -7.4% to 10.1%. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据