4.7 Review

The utilization of eco-friendly recycled powder from concrete and brick waste in new concrete: A critical review

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103807

关键词

Recycled powder (RP); Construction and demolition (C&D) waste; Properties introduction; Improvement method; Benefits

资金

  1. Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD1101002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52008364]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recycled powder (RP) is the main by-product in the reclamation of construction and demolition (C&D) waste. A body of literature on the use of RP as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in concrete is currently available, whereas a detailed review on the properties of RP concrete has been lacking until now. Considering that concrete and brick waste account for a large proportion of C&D waste and that other components have specific recycling paths, this paper provides a critical review on the utilization of recycled concrete powder (RCP) from concrete waste and recycled brick powder (RBP) from brick waste in new concrete. The preparation technology of RP and the properties of RP concrete are systematically reviewed; in addition, improvement methods and a benefit evaluation of RP concrete are further introduced. Based on statistical data that describe the activity index of RP and the compressive strength of RP concrete, the median diameter and replacement ratio of RP in concrete preparation should be below 30 mu m and 30%, respectively. The use of RP improves the durability of concrete when the RP fineness is superior to the cement fineness. Increasing the RP fineness is an effective approach to improving the properties of RP concrete, and a CO2-curing treatment of RCP is an eco-friendly modification method. Furthermore, the use of RP in concrete has good economic and environmental benefits. Therefore, one expects that this review helps the further use of RP in concrete.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据