4.8 Review

A historical overview of the activation and porosity of metal-organic frameworks

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 49, 期 20, 页码 7406-7427

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00997k

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) [DE-EE0008816]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences Program for Separation [DE-FG02-08ER15967]
  3. Northwestern University Institute for Catalysis in Energy Processes (ICEP) - DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-03ER15457]
  4. Northwestern University
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003763]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Stewardship Science Graduate Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the first reports of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), this unique class of crystalline, porous materials has garnered increasing attention in a wide variety of applications such as gas storage and separation, catalysis, enzyme immobilization, drug delivery, water capture, and sensing. A fundamental feature of MOFs is their porosity which provides space on the micro- and meso-scale for confining and exposing their functionalities. Therefore, designing MOFs with high porosity and developing suitable activation methods for preserving and accessing their pore space have been a common theme in MOF research. Reticular chemistry allows for the facile design of MOFs from highly tunable metal nodes and organic linkers in order to realize different pore structures, topologies, and functionalities. With the hope of shedding light on future research endeavors in MOF porosity, it is worthwhile to examine the development of MOFs, with an emphasis on their porosity and how to properly access their pore space. In this review, we will provide an overview of the historic evolution of porosity and activation of MOFs, followed by a synopsis of the strategies to design and preserve permanent porosity in MOFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据