4.8 Review

Machine Learning and Digital Twin Driven Diagnostics and Prognostics of Light-Emitting Diodes

期刊

LASER & PHOTONICS REVIEWS
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/lpor.202000254

关键词

data-driven methods; diagnostics and prognostics; digital twins; light-emitting diodes (LEDs); machine learning (ML) algorithms; statistical methods

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51805147, 61673037]
  2. Research Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University [RK21]
  3. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [GDZB-017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are among the key innovations that have revolutionized the lighting industry, due to their versatility in applications, higher reliability, longer lifetime, and higher efficiency compared with other light sources. The demand for increased lifetime and higher reliability has attracted a significant number of research studies on the prognostics and lifetime estimation of LEDs, ranging from the traditional failure data analysis to the latest degradation modeling and machine learning based approaches over the past couple of years. However, there is a lack of reviews that systematically address the currently evolving machine learning algorithms and methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and lifetime prediction of LEDs. To address those deficiencies, a review on the diagnostic and prognostic methods and algorithms based on machine learning that helps to improve system performance, reliability, and lifetime assessment of LEDs is provided. The fundamental principles, pros and cons of methods including artificial neural networks, principal component analysis, hidden Markov models, support vector machines, and Bayesian networks are presented. Finally, discussion on the prospects of the machine learning implementation from LED packages, components to system level reliability analysis, potential challenges and opportunities, and the future digital twin technology for LEDs lifetime analysis is provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据