4.6 Article

Chitosan-Based biogels: A potential approach to trap and bioremediate naphthalene

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125374

关键词

Chitosan; Naphthalene; Emulsion; Bioremediation; Biogel

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN2018-04636]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas sp. bacteria were incorporated into a double emulsion system (water in oil in water, W/O/W), which can be injected in the subsurface to trap and biotreat naphthalene. The outermost phase of the W/O/W emulsion was an aqueous solution of chitosan (1.65 wt.%). Naphthalene could be dispersed in the aqueous chitosan phase of W/O/W emulsions. Two separate primary water in oil (W/O) emulsions were emulsified in chitosan, using Tween 20 as emulsifier. W/O emulsions were prepared with canola oil (containing ethylcellulose and calcium stearate as emulsifiers), and aqueous solutions of either Pseudomonas sp. in minimal broth or sodium citrate (crosslinker). The formation of W/O/W double emulsions was verified with optical and confocal microscopy. Without addition of triggers able to induce gelation on demand, W/O/W emulsions were stable and mainly viscous under shear. The shear elastic modulus (G' = 1.90 +/- 0.39 Pa) and the shear viscous modulus (G '' = 5.76 +/- 0.06 Pa) were low, to facilitate pumping in the subsurface. With addition of the surfactant cocamidopropyl betaine, W/O/W emulsions were destabilized on demand, thereby releasing citrate (crosslinker) and Pseudomonas sp. in the chitosan phase, where naphthalene was dispersed. Mixing chitosan with citrate led to its gelation, trapping naphthalene. Mixing naphthalene with Pseudomonas sp. led to its bioremediation. Gelation was demonstrated by the increase in the viscoelastic moduli, with G' = 111.02 +/- 1.67 Pa > G '' = 8.66 +/- 0.10 Pa. With naphthalene, Pseudomonas sp. survival in gelled chitosan was confirmed by plating bacteria sampled from the gel. Without naphthalene, Pseudomonas sp. did not survive in chitosan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据