4.4 Article

Intelligent approach for residential load scheduling

期刊

IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION
卷 14, 期 21, 页码 4738-4745

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2020.0143

关键词

domestic appliances; building management systems; scheduling; demand side management; hybrid electric vehicles; power markets; pricing; smart power grids; tariffs; load regulation; residential load scheduling; residential sector; residential loads; desired scheduling window; scheduling process; intelligent load scheduling model; user intervention; preferred scheduling window

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Residential load scheduling has been introduced in recent years as a result of implementing demand response programmes in the residential sector. Up to now, studies have focussed on developing algorithms for scheduling the residential loads with the objective of reducing the electricity payment while satisfying the users' comfort level. To aim at this goal, the user should determine the desired scheduling window for each appliance to initiate the scheduling process. Although these algorithms designed to benefit the end-users, determining the scheduling window for each appliance at the beginning of the scheduling process can be challenging. In this study, an intelligent load scheduling model is proposed to perform the scheduling with the least user intervention. The proposed model predicts the preferred scheduling window for each appliance and initiates the scheduling process. Furthermore, the degradation cost of the battery pack in the vehicle-to-grid mode is considered in the cost function. The model is applied to a case study containing plug-in hybrid electric vehicle and flexible loads such as a washing machine and dishwasher under inclining block rates and hourly pricing tariffs. The results indicate that implementing the model in a residential building can decrease the electricity payment while performing the residential load scheduling with the least user intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据