3.8 Article

Hepascore predicts liver outcomes and all-cause mortality in long-term methotrexate users: A retrospective cohort study

期刊

JGH OPEN
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 1211-1216

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12430

关键词

all-cause mortality; decompensation; Hepascore; hepatotoxicity; methotrexate

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research [CouncilAPP1128889]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aim: Methotrexate (MTX) is routinely used for immunological disorders, and its long-term use is associated with hepatotoxicity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a serum liver fibrosis test (Hepascore) predicted the risk of adverse liver-related outcomes and mortality. Methods: A total of 92 patients in Western Australia who had a long-term MTX intake history, from 2004 to 2016, were recruited and followed up from the first Hepascore to death or end of the study. Clinical data, all deaths, and liver-related outcomes (liver-related death and decompensation) were obtained from hospital, PathWest, and WA Data Linkage Unit databases. Results: Nine deaths and four adverse liver-related outcomes occurred during the follow up of 354 person-years. The 5-year survival was 86.1%. The liver-related outcome free survival was 95.6%. Baseline Hepascore >= 0.84 was associated with advanced fibrosis on liver biopsy (P = 0.025). A baseline Hepascore >= 0.84 was significantly associated with higher risks for adverse liver-related outcomes (P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (P = 0.001). Cox regression demonstrated that only baseline Hepascore >= 0.84 was independently associated with the increased risk of all-cause mortality (7.91 [1.52-41.29], P = 0.014). Moreover, any Hepascore >= 0.84 found during follow up was independently associated with the increased risk of all-cause mortality (86.18 [4.03-1844.83], P = 0.007). Conclusions: This study demonstrated the potential importance of Hepascore monitoring in long-term MTX users. Patients with a Hepascore higher than 0.84 at any stage had increased mortality, but further studies are required to confirm this finding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据