4.6 Article

Real-world evidence of tisagenlecleucel for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma

期刊

BLOOD ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 21, 页码 5414-5424

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003092

关键词

-

资金

  1. Public Health Service from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U24CA076518]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  4. NHLBI [U24HL138660, OT3HL147741, R21HL140314, U01HL128568, R01HL129472, R01HL130388, R01HL131731]
  5. NCI [U24HL138660, U24CA233032]
  6. Health Resources and Services Administration [HHSH250201700006C, SC1MC31881-01-00, HHSH250201700007C]
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-181-2850, N00014-18-1-2888, N00014-20-1-2705]
  8. NIH from NCI [P01CA111412, R01CA152108, R01CA215134, R01CA218285, R01CA231141]
  9. NIAID [R01AI128775, U01AI069197, U01AI126612]
  10. BARDA from the US Department of Health and Human Services
  11. Be the Match Foundation
  12. Boston Children's Hospital
  13. Dana-Farber
  14. Japan Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Data Center
  15. St Baldrick's Foundation
  16. National Marrow Donor Program
  17. Medical College of Wisconsin
  18. AbbVie
  19. Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  20. Adaptive Biotechnologies
  21. Adienne SA
  22. Allovir, Inc.
  23. Amgen, Inc.
  24. Angiocrine Bioscience
  25. Anthem, Inc.
  26. Astellas Pharma US
  27. AstraZeneca
  28. Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc.
  29. bluebird bio, Inc.
  30. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
  31. Celgene Corp.
  32. CSL Behring
  33. CytoSen Therapeutics, Inc.
  34. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd
  35. Gamida-Cell, Ltd
  36. Genzyme
  37. HistoGenetics, Inc.
  38. Incyte Corporation
  39. Janssen Biotech, Inc.
  40. Janssen/Johnson Johnson
  41. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  42. Kiadis Pharma
  43. Kite, a Gilead Company
  44. Kyowa Kirin
  45. Legend Biotech
  46. Magenta Therapeutics
  47. Mallinckrodt LLC
  48. Medac GmbH
  49. Merck Co., Inc.
  50. Merck Sharp Dohme Corp.
  51. Millennium
  52. Takeda Oncology Co.
  53. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
  54. Novartis Oncology
  55. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
  56. Omeros Corp.
  57. Oncoimmune, Inc.
  58. OptumHealth
  59. Orca Biosystems, Inc.
  60. Pfizer, Inc.
  61. Pharmacyclics, LLC
  62. REGiMMUNE Corp.
  63. Sanofi Genzyme
  64. Shire
  65. Sobi, Inc.
  66. Takeda Pharma
  67. Terumo BCT
  68. Viracor Eurofins
  69. Xenikos BV
  70. NIH, NCI grant [K12CA087723]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tisagenlecleucel is a CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for treatment of pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The initial experience with tisagenlecleucel in a real-world setting from a cellular therapy registry is presented here. As of January 2020, 511 patients were enrolled from 73 centers, and 410 patients had follow-up data reported (ALL, n = 255; NHL, n = 155), with a median follow-up of 13.4 and 11.9 months for ALL and NHL, respectively. Among patients with ALL, the initial complete remission (CR) rate was 85.5%. Twelve-month duration of response (DOR), event-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates were 60.9%, 52.4%, and 77.2%, respectively. Among adults with NHL, the best overall response rate was 61.8%, including an initial CR rate of 39.5%. Six-month DOR, progression-free survival, and OS rates were 55.3%, 38.7%, and 70.7%, respectively. Grade >= 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were reported in 11.6% and 7.5% of all patients, respectively. Similar outcomes were observed in patients with in-specification and out-of-specification products as a result of viability <80% (range, 61% to 79%). This first report of tisagenlecleucel in the real-world setting demonstrates outcomes with similar efficacy and improved safety compared with those seen in the pivotal trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据