4.7 Article

Eigenvector continuation as an efficient and accurate emulator for uncertainty quantification

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 810, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135814

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [279384907 -SFB 1245]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0018638, DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [758027]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under the FRIB Theory Alliance award [DE-SC0013617]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

First principles calculations of atomic nuclei based on microscopic nuclear forces derived from chiral effective field theory (EFT) have blossomed in the past years. A key element of such ab initio studies is the understanding and quantification of systematic and statistical errors arising from the omission of higher-order terms in the chiral expansion as well as the model calibration. While there has been significant progress in analyzing theoretical uncertainties for nucleon-nucleon scattering observables, the generalization to multi-nucleon systems has not been feasible yet due to the high computational cost of evaluating observables for a large set of low-energy couplings. In this Letter we show that a new method called eigenvector continuation (EC) can be used for constructing an efficient and accurate emulator for nuclear many-body observables, thereby enabling uncertainty quantification in multi-nucleon systems. We demonstrate the power of EC emulation with a proof-of-principle calculation that lays out all correlations between bulk ground-state observables in the few-nucleon sector. On the basis of ab initio calculations for the ground-state energy and radius in 4 He, we demonstrate that EC is more accurate and efficient compared to established methods like Gaussian processes. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据