4.8 Review

Polyoxometalates in solution: speciation under spotlight

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 49, 期 21, 页码 7568-7601

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00392a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [M2203, P27534, P33089]
  2. University of Vienna
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P33089, M2203] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyoxometalates (POMs) are a large group of anionic polynuclear metal-oxo clusters with discrete and chemically modifiable structures. In most aqueous POM solutions, numerous, and often highly negatively charged, species of different nuclearities are formed. It is rather difficult to determine the dominant POM species or their combination, which is responsible for the specific POM activity, during a particular application. Thus, the identification of all individual speciation profiles is essential for the successful implementation of POMs in solution applications. This review article summarizes species that are present in isopoly- and heteropolyvanadates, -niobates, -molybdates and -tungstates aqueous solutions and covers their stability and transformations. The ion-distribution diagrams over a wide pH range are presented in a comprehensive manner. These diagrams are intended for the targeted use of POMs, and in a clear form shows species that are in equilibrium at the given pH value. Thus, the data accumulated in this review can serve as both a starting point and a complete reference material for determining the composition of POM solutions. Some examples are highlighted where the POM speciation studies led to a detailed understanding of their role in applications. In doing so, we aim to motivate the POM community for more speciation studies and to make the subject more comprehensible, both for synthetic POM chemists and for scientists with different backgrounds interested in applying POMs in biological, medical, electrochemical, supramolecular and nanochemistry fields, or as homogeneous catalysts and other water-soluble materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据