4.5 Article

Parasite infestation influences life history but not boldness behavior in placental live-bearing fish

期刊

OECOLOGIA
卷 194, 期 4, 页码 635-648

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04795-6

关键词

Matrotrophy; Parasites; Placenta; Poeciliidae; Poeciliopsis retropinna

类别

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [SBP2012/61, 864.14.008]
  2. Academy Ecology Fund from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [Eco/1710]
  3. SICB graduate research grant
  4. NSF [1523666]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parasites can negatively affect the reproductive success of hosts. Placental species may be particularly susceptible, because parasite-induced stress during pregnancy could potentially influence embryo development. Here, we examine the consequences of a trematode infestation (black spot disease, BSD) for fetal development and adult behavior in 19 natural populations of the placental live-bearing fish species Poeciliopsis retropinna (Poeciliidae) in Costa Rica. First, we observed substantial variation in parasite infestation among populations which correlated with a number of local environmental conditions (elevation, river width, depth, and flow velocity). Furthermore, we observed substantial variation in parasite infestation among females within populations associated with maternal age and size. We found that the infestation rate significantly influenced embryonic development, with more heavily parasitized females producing smaller and worse-conditioned offspring at birth, possibly, because a costly immune response during pregnancy limits, either directly or indirectly, nourishment to developing embryos. Finally, a behavioral experiment in the field showed that the infestation rate did not affect an individual's boldness. Our study indicates that in placental live-bearing fish parasite infestation leads to reduced embryo provisioning during pregnancy, resulting in a smaller offspring size and quality at birth potentially with negative implications for offspring fitness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据