4.7 Article

Enhanced Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing With Index Modulation

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 4786-4801

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2017.2702618

关键词

Coordinate interleaving; index modulation; inphase/quadrature; linear constellation precoding; log-likelihood ratio; OFDM

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61431005, 61501190]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030308006]
  3. National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University [2017D08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Index modulation concept has attracted considerable research interest in the past few years. As a realization of index modulation in the frequency domain, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing with index modulation (OFDM-IM) has recently been proposed, which conveys information bits through both the subcarrier activation patterns and the amplitude phase modulation constellation points. This paper proposes two enhanced OFDM-IM schemes aimed at achieving higher spectral efficiency and diversity gain, respectively. The first one, termed OFDM with hybrid in-phase/quadrature index modulation (OFDM-HIQ-IM), explores the I-and Q-dimensions jointly for index modulation, allowing transmission of more index modulation bits in each subcarrier group. The second one, termed linear constellation precoded OFDM-IQ-IM (LP-OFDM-IQ-IM), spreads information symbols across two adjacent active subcarriers through linear constellation precoding to harvest additional diversity gain. By maximizing the minimum squared Euclidean distance, two different realizations of LP-OFDM-IQ-IM are derived, which leads to a rotated and a diamond shaped constellation, respectively. The proposed OFDM-HIQ-IM and LP-OFDM-IQ-IM, as revealed by both theoretical analyses and computer simulations, enable low-complexity detection and exhibit superior error rate performance over the existing OFDM-IM schemes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据