4.7 Article

Determining available potassium in soil by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with cation exchange membrane adsorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 2697-2703

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ja00394h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFD0201501]
  2. Edanz Group China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potassium in soil is an essential nutrient for plants. However, the total potassium content of soil cannot be used to assess soil fertility and plant nutrition because not all of the potassium is available to plants. It is therefore necessary to determine the available potassium content of soil. Traditional methods for determining available potassium in soil are not suitable for rapid on-site use because they require complex sample treatments and numerous extractants, are time consuming, and use complex instruments. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy is fast, simple, and flexible. However, traditional laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy cannot distinguish between different forms of potassium in soil so cannot be used to determine available potassium. Here, we describe a new method involving laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with cation exchange membrane adsorption for rapidly and accurately determining available potassium in soil. A good correlation was found between spectral intensity and the available potassium concentration. The coefficient of determination for the calibration curve was 0.99, the limit of detection was 2.2 mg kg(-1), and the limit of quantitation was 7.3 mg kg(-1). Real soil samples were analyzed, and the average relative error between the predicted and reference concentrations was 2.58%. The extraction time was only 10 min. The method does not require chemical extractants like traditional methods for determining available potassium and is markedly faster and less complex than traditional methods. This is the first rapid laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy method for determining available potassium in soil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据