4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

In Situ Distribution Guided Analysis and Visualization of Transonic Jet Engine Simulations

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598604

关键词

In situ analysis; rotating stall analysis; Gaussian mixture model; incremental distribution modeling; feature analysis; high performance computing; collaborative development

资金

  1. NSF [IIS- 1250752, IIS-1065025]
  2. US Department of Energy [DE- SC0007444, DE-DC0012495]
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1250752] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study of flow instability in turbine engine compressors is crucial to understand the inception and evolution of engine stall. Aerodynamics experts have been working on detecting the early signs of stall in order to devise novel stall suppression technologies. A state-of-the-art Navier-Stokes based, time-accurate computational fluid dynamics simulator, TURBO, has been developed in NASA to enhance the understanding of flow phenomena undergoing rotating stall. Despite the proven high modeling accuracy of TURBO, the excessive simulation data prohibits post-hoc analysis in both storage and I/O time. To address these issues and allow the expert to perform scalable stall analysis, we have designed an in situ distribution guided stall analysis technique. Our method summarizes statistics of important properties of the simulation data in situ using a probabilistic data modeling scheme. This data summarization enables statistical anomaly detection for flow instability in post analysis, which reveals the spatiotemporal trends of rotating stall for the expert to conceive new hypotheses. Furthermore, the verification of the hypotheses and exploratory visualization using the summarized data are realized using probabilistic visualization techniques such as uncertain isocontouring. Positive feedback from the domain scientist has indicated the efficacy of our system in exploratory stall analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据